Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

View Article
20

It’s right there on the front page of the newspaper: The governor’s got a $3.4 billion hole in the budget to wrestle to the ground and fill – so she’s cut spending $1.3 billion a year.



But there are two other numbers in the newspaper that are peculiar.



$21.4 billion – which is what the state is spending this year.



And $21 billion – which is what Governor Perdue says the state has to spend next year.



In fact, the precise difference between this year’s and next year’s budget is $360 million. A reduction in spending of two-tenths of one percent.



And consider this: Under the governor’s new budget 268 state employees ‘could’ lose their jobs – out of 275,000. That’s a reduction of one-tenth of one percent.



So why’s everyone still howling about a $3.4 billion hole in the budget – and how on earth can the governor say she’s cutting $1.3 billion a year – if spending’s only dropping $360 million?



I guess there’s plenty of room to argue what is and is not a cut – for instance, some folks say if the state needs to increase health care spending a billion dollars (to cover increased costs) and can’t – that’s a cut. They’ve got a case and some people agree and some don’t.



But with all the howling about $3.4 billion deficits and billion-dollar cuts just about everyone’s lost track of the fact state government is going to be spending essentially the same amount next year – as it spent this year.




Click Here to discuss and comment on this and other articles.

Comments

Actions: E-mail | Permalink | RSS comment feed |

Copyright (c) Talking About Politics   :   Terms Of Use   :   Privacy Statement