|
|
|
Entries for the 'National Republicans ' Category
Gary Pearce posted on March 17, 2010 14:22
A reader commented that it would be “whining” for Obama to blame Republicans for the country’s economic mess, as I had suggested.
Question: Was Ronald Reagan “whining” all those years?
Through the 1984 campaign – four years after he unseated Jimmy Carter – Reagan’s basic message was that he inherited a mess, it would take time to dig out and “why would we want to go back?”
If that’s whining, Obama needs to do more of it.
If I was in charge of message at the White House, every speech would start with that whine.
Click here to read and comment on what others are saying
Gary Pearce posted on March 17, 2010 10:24
Public Policy Polling says that – on health care reform – Democratic Congressmen Bob Etheridge and Health Shuler “both have to decide between voting the way that folks in their party would like them to, or voting the way voters in their district as a whole would like them to.”
But I’m not convinced that voting for reform will hurt them this fall.
For one thing, PPP also finds that, nationally, support for reform is rising.
For another, the picture is likely to be very different in November.
People don’t like reform now – in part – because they don’t know what’s in it. Fear trumps facts.
If a bill passes, Democrats will be able to talk about specific benefits.
If it doesn’t pass, they’ll be able to blame Republicans for everything wrong in health care.
Regardless, once the fight is over, Republicans will face the same challenge Democrats face now: how to get people interested in health-care reform when they’re mostly worried about the economy.
Health-care reform may be old news in November.
Click here to read and comment on what others are saying
Gary Pearce posted on March 16, 2010 15:07
Karl Rove is still playing mind games with Democrats.
Pay no attention.
Rove claims that, if Congress passes health-care reform, Democrats will lose Congress.
Bunk.
In truth, Rove fears that Democrats will pass reform, Obama will have a victory and Democrats will have something positive to run on this fall.
If the bill passes, nobody will know whether it made health-care better or worse.
But Democrats will get a boost of confidence. And Obama will be able to focus on fixing the economy – and explaining how Republicans got us in this mess.
Click here to read and comment on what others are saying
Gary Pearce posted on March 08, 2010 08:51
The Tea Party crowd is in a frenzy over rising deficits and the national debt.
In Asheville Friday, Republican candidates fell all over themselves at a Tea Party meeting that featured a clock tracking the debt.
Do these people have any memory cells whatsoever?
Obviously not, so let me remind them that, just 10 years ago, the budget deficit was heading toward zero. The debate in Washington was whether to spend the coming surplus on Social Security, tax cuts or paying down the debt.
That’s right: paying down the debt.
That was during the administration of a Democratic President named Bill Clinton. Before George Bush and a Republican Congress wrecked the budget.
And the Tea Party wants to return that crowd to power?
Click here to read and comment on what others are saying
Gary Pearce posted on March 04, 2010 10:23
A supporter of the new Wake school board held up a sign at this week’s hearing: “Elections matter.”
At the health-care summit President Obama told John McCain: “The election is over.”
They’re right. And Obama should ram through health-care reform just like the new school board majority is ramming through its new policies.
Obama needs to get something – anything – passed. Then move on to jobs and the economy.
And he’s better off being strong and wrong than weak and right.
Few people will understand what’s in his bill – or whether it makes things better or worse.
The Republicans will have a devil of a time overturning it, no matter how November turns out.
Similarly, in WakeCounty, there’s talk of a recall election of the new majority.
Two problems: How do you do a recall in North Carolina? And what makes you think it would turn out any different?
Click here to read and comment on what others are saying
Carter Wrenn posted on February 25, 2010 13:06
Up in Washington last weekend at the Conservative Political Action Conference every time Scott Brown’s name was mentioned the conservative hordes let out a bellow of approval – but, then, two days later Brown voted with the Democrats in the Senate to end a filibuster against President Obama’s latest ‘Stimulus Bill’ and Democratic leader Harry Reid purred, “I believe this is the beginning of a new day in the Senate.”
Scott Brown’s election has been heralded as a conservative triumph but, in fact, it’s not. Instead, Brown’s win is a triumph of Washington Republican pragmatism. The Washington Republicans – whose goal is Republican majorities regardless of ideological persuasion – have succeeded in electing a crucial 41st Republican vote and, in the process, probably dealt a fatal blow to Obamacare. So, they can argue, credibly, that even if Brown strays on Obama’s Stimulus Bills the game was worth the candle and adding up the pro’s and con’s, no matter how Brown votes, Senate Republicans come out way ahead.
But, at the same time, they have created – for themselves – a pair of problems: First, they didn’t elect Brown by saying he was another Olympia Snow – instead they waved flags of ideological purity all over the Internet persuading Republican faithful across the nation to pour millions into Brown’s campaign.
Result: The Washington Republican Establishment fooled the core activists in their own party, once again, and a lot of people who oppose Obama’s Stimulus Bills, abortion, and gay marriage contributed to a Massachusetts Republican who supports all three – which leads straight to the second problem.
The Independents who voted Republican last fall didn’t do it out of love for the Grand Old Party – they did it because they’re mad as blazes at President Obama. They want changes in Washington. A lot of changes – which Senator Brown voting with Democrats won’t deliver.
It sure looks like Independent voters are going to stick with Republicans through this fall election but if they wake up after the election to find Washington politics rolling along as usual – guess who they’re going be mad at next?
Click here to read and comment on what others are saying
Gary Pearce posted on February 25, 2010 08:38
President Obama may be setting up Republicans for a classic one-two punch.
First, the left jab: an open, public “discussion” where he challenges Republicans to put their ideas on the table. That’s what they said they wanted, isn’t it?
Then, the right uppercut: ramming a health-care bill through using something called “reconciliation.”
I don’t know what “reconciliation” means, but it is apparently a parliamentary term for “steamroller.”
Republicans will howl about the process. But who cares?
Obama needs a win – no matter how bloody. He needs to look strong. Then he can spend the rest of the year blaming Republicans for not doing more. And Republicans can blame him for doing too much.
And we’ll get a verdict in November.
Either way, Obama’s chances to pass a bill won’t get better.
Click here to read and comment on what others are saying
Gary Pearce posted on February 22, 2010 08:16
The best message in politics is always: “It’s Time for a Change.”
That worked like a charm for Democrats in 2006 and 2008. Voters were anxious, angry and ready to throw out the bums in power in Washington.
Nothing has changed this year – except Democrats are now the bums in power.
Democratic governors – many of them up for election this year – worried this weekend that President Obama’s message hasn’t connected.
It hasn’t. People still like Obama. But he’s reduced to arguing that his stimulus bill saved jobs and the economy.
Unlike Ronald Reagan, who also took office in tough economic times, Obama isn’t selling a popular cure. Reagan was selling lower taxes. Obama, when you get down to it, is selling more spending.
Republicans believe they’re on the right side of the winning message this year. So why should they do anything responsible – like solving the debt crisis or protecting millions of Americans from ruinous medical bills?
Likely as not, Republicans will win big enough this fall to once again become part of the bums in power in Washington.
Once they do, they’ll have a choice the next two years: Do something responsible – or just try to beat Obama in 2012. They’ll pick the latter.
Once Obama wins reelection against Mitt Romney or Tim Pawlenty or whatever loser the GOP nominates (it won’t be Sarah Palin, though she or Ron Paul may be the Ross Perot of 2012), maybe something will get done.
Until then, Americans apparently will just have to hang on and hope for the best.
Click here to read and comment on what others are saying
Gary Pearce posted on February 19, 2010 10:17
Has there ever been a more arrogant crowd than the new WakeCounty school board majority?
Judging from their comments yesterday, any sign of dissent or disagreement from Superintendent Del Burns is “insubordination” – and a firing offense.
Their attitude reminds me of an old political adage: “The lower the office, the bigger the ego.”
There’s a Tea Party flavor to all this.
The new powers-that-be remind me of Sarah Palin complaining about smarty-pants elitists who keep asking her questions about factual matters. Who needs facts and knowledge when you’re on the side of God and Right?
Teacher-bashing has long been a staple of right wing Republicans. Russell Capps thinks the superintendent should be a businessman, not an educator.
Maybe he could get Ken Lewis from Bank of America.
Pardon me, but I’d like the person running the schools to know something about teaching kids.
People of good will who care about education had better get organized. Or this crowd is going to wreck the WakeCounty schools – and do incalculable damage to the Triangle’s dynamic economic climate.
Click here to read and comment on what others are saying
Gary Pearce posted on February 17, 2010 14:00
Politico has an excellent overview of what’s happening to once-Republican states that went Democratic in 2008 – including North Carolina.
One reason it’s excellent, of course, is that it quotes me. Click here to read the analysis.
Click here to read and comment on what others are saying
|
|
|