View Article
08
Governor McCrory and Republican legislators were against incentives before they were for them.
 
McCrory is clearly for them when he can bask in the announcement of 2,600 new jobs by MetLife. (Hello, Snoopy!)
 
Or maybe he’s for them when they are negotiated by Moore & Van Allen, his old law firm.
 
But his spokeswoman assures us, “There was a complete firewall and no interaction.”
 
And a Moore & Van Allen’s spokesman chimes in that the Gov’s old job was “not part in any way, shape or form” with the firm’s economic development team.
 
Conveniently enough, that spokesman is Brian Nick, identified by the N&O as “a former top McCrory campaign adviser.”
 
Does that mean the Governor deserves no credit whatsoever for what apparently was an eight-month courtship? He just showed up for the cameras?
 
Senator Phil Berger, who once questioned the Perdue administration’s $45 million incentive package for Continental Tire, “dismissed questions” about this one, which has an eye-popping price tag of $94 million.
 
Berger says, “I think it’s a whole different circumstance.”
 
Like how, exactly?
 
Give Rep. Skip Stam credit for consistency. He said of the MetLife deal, “I oppose picking one company over another company.”
 
The N&O noted: “The state GOP platform calls incentives “contrary to the free enterprise system.”
 
Expect, apparently, when Republicans can claim credit for creating jobs. That’s called incentive.
Actions: E-mail | Permalink | Comments (1) RSS comment feed |

Comments

dap916
# dap916
Friday, March 08, 2013 2:48 PM
I'm also against taxpayer dollars being paid out for "incentives" to businesses that want to relocate here in NC. We're like-minded on that. I only have to present the money lost with the Dell venture here in our fair state to show how so many times, incentives don't work out for us.

I won't argue this with you here. I am excited that we're seeing businesses coming here and hiring our people when just so many need those jobs. Our state is among the highest in unemployment in the nation. So, aside from how these new jobs were obtained, I see how maybe, possibly, I could change my opinion on incentives.

I'm kind of like your guy Obama, Gary. He was against gay marriage before he was for it. He was against gun control before he was for it. He has said publically that he has changed his mind on those issues (and others) throughout the years. But, alas, that is just fine for progressive/democrats because, I mean after all...it's Obama for crying out loud. He's "allowed", y'know? Well, I might change my mind on this.

Hopefully these new businesses coming here receiving incentives that I don't particularly agree with will be successful and those that do get jobs with them are able to keep their jobs. Hopefully our state will see an increase into the state general fund through new tax revenue that will not only offset the state's expenditures to get the businesses here but will realize far more revenue making the incentives prudent from an ROI (Return On Investment) standpoint.

I'm betting that we'll NEVER see the Billions lost that our taxpayers have lost on the massive give-aways to companies like Solyndra and other weak "alternative energy" businesses our federal government spent all those taxpayer bucks on...only to see that money fly away in the wind.

Crossing my fingers these companies will be successful and I would hope that the progressive democrats that were in favor of incentives when democrats gave them out will work with republicans and the companies to make them successful as well.

Thanks, Gary.

Post Comment

Only registered users may post comments.
Blog by Snyder Interactive : Copyright (c) Talking About Politics   :  DNN Hosting  :  Terms Of Use  :  Privacy Statement