View Article
03
I have a feeling that Mitt Romney will get a bounce out of tonight’s debate. Not because I play the ridiculous expectations game, but because a Romney bounce is due and he can easily do well.
 
He needs to set aside all the conflicting and confusing advice candidates always get before debates. I spent almost 30 years doing debate prep, and I found one piece of advice that always works: Bugs Bunny always beats Daffy Duck.
 
This comes from author-pundit Jeff Greenfield. In the cartoons, Daffy Duck was spewing spittle and flying off the handle. Bugs was cool. And Bugs always got the best of things.
 
In other words, the most comfortable person on the stage is always the debate winner. Think JFK and Nixon.
 
Now, it’s hard to beat Barack Obama there. He is Mr. Cool.
 
But if Romney is confident and steady – especially after his unsteady last few weeks – he will get another look from undecided and weakly committed voters.
 
Plus, as I’ve said before, the media is looking for a new story. They’re getting tired of writing that Obama has it won.
 
Romney’s risk is that he overpreps, comes out tight, starts firing off odd “zingers” and sounding stiff and out of touch. Think Al Gore and George H.W. Bush.
 
If he comes across as an approximation of a normal human being, he’ll be back in the thick of it. And momentum will shift.
Actions: E-mail | Permalink | Comments (3) RSS comment feed |

Comments

clarence swinney
# clarence swinney
Wednesday, October 03, 2012 10:06 AM
repeBALANCE THAT BUDGET
1945 to 1980 we taxed wealth and estates to pay off WWII debt.
Now, we need the same to Pay off the “Republican” debt.
We have an income of 14,000B.
2013 budget calls for 2900B in revenue and 900B in deficit.
A shame that a nation with 14,000B income borrows 900B on a 3800B Budget.
We rank #4 on Inequality in OECD nations and above only Chile and Mexico as Least taxed.
In Federal-State and Local taxes we tax 27% of our GDP..
Since 1980, our tax rates have been cut to favor the wealthy.
Top 50% take 86% of individual income and pay a 12.5% Tax Rate
70,000,000 take 14% and all pay the full payroll tax.
The top 400 are billionaires. Some pay no payroll tax.
Most pay less than 1%.

We MUST go back to taxing Estates and Wealth at higher rates.
One family has more wealth than 90% of families.

We can balance our budget and pay off our debt which will give the middle class a larger share of our wealth and an improved standard of living. clarence swinneyat but so important
dap916
# dap916
Wednesday, October 03, 2012 4:00 PM
The top 10% of the income earners pay the vast majority of the taxes going into our federal tax system. But, hey...best thing is to just take ALL of their wealth and use it to spend and spend and spend and spend...and....well, you get the point.

Sooner or later, my friend, that money runs out. And then what? Think about that..if you have the capability to do so.

People in America work to be wealthy...most don't make it...but they work to achieve that. It's what America is all about for crying out loud. Who really wants to just remain poor...trusting in government to "take care of them"? Is that what you want? Is that what the majority wants? Of course not. Sure, we have to "take care" of those that come on hard times and we then expect them to pull themselves up by their bootstraps and WORK their way out of that kind of existence. Taxing the billionaires and taking away huge amounts from the successful in our country will be a short-term solution to a very long term problem. I'm amazed at your post. Do a Google on what segment of our society pays the lion's share of the taxes in our country. That 47% that don't pay ANYTHING isn't in that mix. The so-called "middle class" is paying some, of course. But, the biggest amount is the hugely successful...the big businesses...the employers in our nation...the rich. Take that away and what do you have?

Get a clue.
Carbine
# Carbine
Wednesday, October 03, 2012 8:09 PM
Yeah, raising taxes will spur the economy! Sure it will!

There is no just reason why the government should profit from anyone's death--period. If I pay my fair share of taxes on all the income I earn during my lifetime, why should the government get ANOTHER cut of it when I die? Every citizen should have the right to arrange for the disposal of his assets upon his death as he sees fit. And the estate tax has absolutely nothing to do with the debt--the rates could be exactly what they were after WWII and it wouldn't make the smallest dent in the debt. Returning to the Clinton era top tax rates wouldn't raise much more either. The soaring deficit can only be addressed by cutting back on our ridiculous rates of spending. Anything else you hear is propaganda or nonsense.

Post Comment

Only registered users may post comments.
Blog by Snyder Interactive : Copyright (c) Talking About Politics   :  DNN Hosting  :  Terms Of Use  :  Privacy Statement