View Article
19
The N&O reported that one of Sen. Phil Berger’s five goals for the new Republican Senate is:
 
“Write a state budget with no tax increases and with the intent of letting temporary sales tax and income tax surcharges expire on schedule” (italics added).
 
Saying that's your “intent” is a lot different from promising you’ll do it. Is this a shift in position?
Actions: E-mail | Permalink | Comments (2) RSS comment feed |

Comments

Anon
# Anon
Friday, November 19, 2010 6:52 PM
"hope" is also a lot different than promising you will do something. Most people like to "cash in their hopes"
dap916
# dap916
Saturday, November 20, 2010 2:50 PM
The democrats "intended" to keep the republicans from winning the legislature this election year...Um...

That was a pipe dream...but Berger's goals aren't.

Next issue.

Post Comment

Only registered users may post comments.
Copyright (c) Talking About Politics   :  DNN Hosting  :  Terms Of Use  :  Privacy Statement