Archives
Got Something to Say?

We welcome and encourage your comments and discussions on TalkingAboutPolitics.com.

Below is our Comment & Discussion Forum.  Here you can comment and discuss our Blog, our Articles, and National and North Carolina Politics and Issues. 

You can either comment anonymously or as a registered user. Registered users are able to create their own "avatar" or personal profile and have more content options. 

** If you do comment (anonymously) without registering, think about using a nickname or at least some initials at the end of your post. It makes it easier for us to respond. **

If you are not a registered user of the blog, click here or click "Register" at the top right to create your profile. 

To comment in a forum:

   1.  Click which forum you'd like to view. 

   2.  Click the article or post that you would like to read and comment on. 

   3.  Click "quote" or "reply" to create and submit your comments.
Comment & Discussion Forum
Forum Home Search
:: Home » Click Here to Discuss & Comment On Our Articles & Posts! » Senate Democrats
Reply To : This really gets interesting. In aarson investigations, they first look for two things, an ignition cource and an accelerant. In the more common unsophisticated arson casee, the accelerant is somethiing like someone gloshing around some gasoline. In this case, it seems highly sophisticated' the intential severing of a gas line. The ignition sources may have been similar rigging of the wiring. This arson does not sound like someone with a personal financial gain going out to burn their own property or someone with a bone to pick doing it themselves. It sounds like someone, either the porperty owner or someone with a beef with the property owner, going out and hiring a professional. It would absolutely rule out some oaf who justs want to see something burn. They don't hire professionals.

One of the first things that would be done in such an investigatoin would be to look at the property owner's insurance sitution. If he is woefully underinsured, it would probably show an absence of motive. If he is heavily insured, especially if he recently increased his coverage, it would make him a prime suspect.

They would also look for who might have had a beef with the property owner.

If this was someone who had a beef with the property owner, it was someone who had some strong criminal connections. Average folks don't have access to hiring professionals to burn someone else's building. One has to wonder what the property owner would be doing associating with such people to get into such a serious dispute that they resort to retaliatory arson.

Any way one slices this, there would be embarassments for a politician, and that undoubtedly is why the report is being illegally supressed.

Where is our news media to get to the bottom of this? The public has a right to know!
Subject :
Message :
 
Add Cancel
Powered By Presstopia
 
Blog by Snyder Interactive : Copyright (c) Talking About Politics   :  Powered By PointClick  :  Terms Of Use  :  Privacy Statement